01
In an ERP program with weak sponsor-level visibility, critical decisions accumulated week by week.
A fixed decision agenda and clear escalation line improved decision visibility and reduced waiting time noticeably.
Fatih Görgülü · PMO · ERP · Transformation Projects
Field experience in digital transformation, AI, PMO, and ERP projects
In transformation projects, the task is not just technology; it is managing decisions, ownership, and delivery discipline.
I turn field experience from software and ERP projects into practical resources that clarify decisions, surface risk, and move delivery forward.
About →
01
12+ years of field experience
02
60+ project deliveries
03
Transformation project manager and advisor
04
PMI Türkiye President, 2025
01
ERP transformation and delivery
Working frames for scope, roles, risk, and go-live.
Explore →02
PMO and project management
The governance space from reporting to decision-making.
Explore →03
Talks & Events
Move into real event records and talk details.
Explore →04
Special projects
Explore work and production beyond ERP.
Explore →Work areas
Work areas that clarify decisions and move delivery forward.
01→02→03→04→
ERP transformation and delivery governance
I consider scope, data, process, and ownership alongside delivery discipline.
PMO and decision mechanisms
I focus on how visibility, risk, and accountability connect to decision quality.
Talks and experience sharing
I share field-based examples in university, internal, and professional community settings.
Special projects and production
This is where I collect production, design, and applied work beyond corporate projects.
Management notes
Three notes from the field
Recurring project situations are often simultaneously matters of decision-making, ownership, and delivery.
02
As go-live approached, ownership was fragmented across teams and risks were pushed into the final weeks.
A single readiness flow clarified accountability and surfaced critical gaps earlier before cutover.
03
The PMO was producing reports, but struggled to convert them into action.
The reporting layer was simplified around decision points, and meetings shifted from status sharing to action tracking.
Executive view
ERP Project Health Tool
A short frame for reviewing project visibility, decision flow, and delivery risk.
Open the short assessmentProject signals
Control surfaceVisibility
Decision flow
Delivery risk
Field evidence
Completed talks and workshops
01
14 February 2025
Atılım Üniversitesi
“Proje Her Dönemin Mesleği” (Projects Are a Profession for Every Era)
A university seminar on the project management community, professional development, and the role of a project mindset across disciplines.
View details →
02
6 November 2025
Şişecam
Making Success Less Accidental Through Project Management
An internal session on project management through goals, planning, communication, risk, and leadership.
View details →
03
13 February 2026
PMI Türkiye ve Teknopark İstanbul
“Dijitalleştik mi, Yoksa Dijital mi Görünüyoruz?” (Are We Digitalised, or Do We Only Look Digital?)
A session on treating digitalisation as a combination of technology, data, ownership, governance, and adoption.
View details →Field perspective
Writing from the field
01
Insight
What are hypercare exit criteria?
Hypercare exit criteria define when the intense post go-live support period can safely move into normal operations. Without them, hypercare either closes too early or turns into an open-ended support phase with unclear scope.
Read insight →02
Insight
Will AI replace project managers?
AI can summarize meetings, draft reports, classify risks, and make project information easier to see. That does not remove the need for project management. It changes where the project manager must create value: ownership, judgement, escalation, stakeholder alignment, and decision quality.
Read insight →03
Insight
Why AI transformation is not only a technology project
AI transformation is often discussed through tools, models, automation, and pilots. In practice, the harder question is organizational: who owns the data, which process will use the output, where human approval sits, and which business decision should improve.
Read insight →Starting point
Selected guides and resources
Three short starting points for seeing scope, decision flow, and delivery risk more clearly.
01
Guide
A practical Fit-Gap frame
Helps read scope, process differences, and decision points together.
Open resource →02
Insight
The transformation paradox
Examines the link between technology investment and management ownership through a field perspective.
Open resource →03
Tool
ERP project health report
Brings delivery signals together in a short, decision-oriented assessment surface.
Open resource →